Skip to content
InSearch
How it works
Enterprise search software ChatGPT Enterprise pricing Coveo vs Lucidworks Dust vs GoSearch Dashworks alternatives Glean pricing Glean alternatives Microsoft Copilot alternatives Dropbox Dash pricing Coveo alternatives Amazon Quick Suite pricing Amazon Q pricing Gemini Enterprise pricing Copilot pricing Slack enterprise search Enterprise search use cases Enterprise search tools AI work assistant Knowledge base search AI enterprise search Internal company search engine Internal knowledge search Workplace search Search all company apps AI knowledge assistant Unified search Search Slack & Drive AI assistant for work Knowledge management RAG for enterprise Cited AI answers Confluence search Notion search AI for support agents Sales enablement search Engineering search HR knowledge assistant Permission-aware search Secure AI search Onboarding knowledge SharePoint search Intranet search See all →
GoSearch alternative Dust alternative Guru alternative Amazon Kendra alternative Lucidworks alternative Moveworks alternative Sinequa alternative Atlassian Rovo alternative Hebbia alternative Onyx alternative Bloomfire alternative Amazon Q Business alternative Gemini Enterprise alternative Google Agentspace alternative ServiceNow Otto alternative Copilot Studio alternative SharePoint agents alternative
Security Pricing Blog Contact

Compare · Guru

Guru wiki enterprise search: Guru alternatives, the Guru search engine, and live cross-app answers

Guru is excellent at verified knowledge: a curated wiki of cards that subject-matter experts keep accurate, surfaced in the flow of work. The limitation teams mention when weighing Guru alternatives is that it answers from what has been curated into Guru, so anything that lives only in Drive, Slack, a Jira ticket or an email is outside its reach.

or see the comparison ↓

One search · cited answers · permission-aware

Answer Console
Demo · sample data
Try
Sources

Ask your company anything

InSearch searches across Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce in one query and returns a written answer with citations, only ever from sources you're allowed to see.

Drive Slack Notion Confluence Gmail Jira Salesforce
↓ one clear, cited answer

Searching connected apps

Working

Answer

Only sources you have access to
Sources

Interactive demo · sample data, no app connected

Every answer cited to its source documents · permission-aware · never trains on your data

InSearch complements that with live search across everything. Instead of relying solely on curated cards, it searches Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce as they are, then returns a written answer with citations to the exact sources. It is permission-aware and never trains on your data, so you get an authoritative answer even for the knowledge nobody got around to curating.

Confluence vs Guru is the comparison people usually reach first, and the two are less interchangeable than the shortlist suggests. Confluence is a documentation platform: long pages, spaces, a hierarchy, and everything an engineering or product team writes at length. Guru is a card system built for short verified answers delivered where someone is already working, with an owner and a review date on each card. Teams that pick Confluence for the job Guru does end up with sprawling pages nobody trusts, and teams that pick Guru for the job Confluence does run out of room on the first real spec. Plenty of companies run both, which is exactly how the find-anything problem starts.

One practical note on evaluating Guru itself: it does not publish prices. Checked again on August 11, 2026, getguru.com/pricing shows no figures at all, and describes Guru as a platform and expertise solution rather than just a per-seat tool, with the investment tailored to your scale, knowledge complexity and AI maturity. That means a scoped engagement quoted on a call, so budget for a sales cycle before you can compare it against anything with a published number.

Guru is built around curated cards, which raises the familiar question of whether to maintain a library or search the sources directly, examined in knowledge base versus enterprise search. Teams comparing curation tools often look at Bloomfire too, or move to company knowledge base search. If your Confluence is the other half of the comparison, Confluence search covers searching it directly, and Atlassian Data Center end of life matters if yours is still self-hosted.

Guru is strong for curated, verified wiki knowledge in the flow of work. InSearch adds live, cross-app search that answers from your apps as they are, cited and permission-aware.

Side by side

Guru vs InSearch, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters InSearch Guru
Source of answers Live search across all your connected apps as they are Curated, verified knowledge cards
Cross-app coverage Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce in one query Knowledge captured into Guru plus some integrations
Cited answers Written answer with inline citations to the exact source docs Answers from verified cards
Permission-aware Item-level permissions enforced at query time Card and collection permissions
Training on your data Never trains on customer data, encrypted under SOC 2 practices Standard security controls
Best suited for Teams that want live answers across all apps, curated or not Teams investing in a verified, curated wiki

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.

Why teams pick InSearch

One cited, permission-aware search across every app

Beyond curated cards

Answers come from your apps as they are, so knowledge nobody curated is still findable and cited.

Live and cross-app

One query across every connected tool, with a written answer and source citations.

Permission-aware

Scoped to exactly what each person can already see, and never trained on.

Good questions

Guru vs InSearch, answered

Guru is a curated wiki first and a search engine over that wiki second. Its search is very good at finding a Card someone wrote and verified, and it does not index the Slack thread, the Drive doc or the Jira ticket where the answer actually lives unless a person copied it into a Card. That is the practical difference between a wiki search box and enterprise search: one searches what was written down for it, the other searches where the work happened.
If you want live answers across all your apps rather than only curated wiki cards, yes. InSearch searches your tools as they are and cites the exact source, so it answers even for knowledge nobody had time to curate into a wiki.
Yes. InSearch searches your Confluence or Notion wiki along with every other app, so curated and uncurated knowledge come back in one cited, permission-aware answer.
They solve different problems. Confluence is for documentation that needs length and structure, such as specs, runbooks and decision records. Guru is for short verified answers surfaced in the flow of work, with an owner and a review date on each card. If you are choosing one to replace the other you will feel the gap quickly; most companies end up running both, which is why cross-app search becomes necessary.
Guru publishes no pricing figures. Re-checked on August 11, 2026, its pricing page shows no numbers and describes Guru as a platform and expertise solution rather than just a per-seat tool, with the investment tailored to your scale, knowledge complexity and AI maturity. Expect a scoped engagement quoted on a call rather than a list price you can budget from.
It depends which half of Guru you are replacing. For curated verified knowledge, Bloomfire and Confluence are the usual comparisons. For the underlying problem of people not finding answers, the shortlist is cross-app enterprise search rather than another wiki, because a second curated library adds another place to look rather than removing one.

More comparisons

See how InSearch compares

vs GoSearch

GoSearch alternative

Cited, permission-aware answers across every app.

 vs Dust

Dust alternative

Search-first, with cited answers out of the box.

 vs Amazon Kendra

Amazon Kendra alternative

Kendra is in maintenance mode. Here is where to land.

 vs Lucidworks

Lucidworks alternative

Workplace search without a Kubernetes cluster to run.

 vs Moveworks

Moveworks alternative

Now a ServiceNow product. Here is the independent option.

 vs Sinequa

Sinequa alternative

Built for the modern SaaS stack, not a two-year rollout.

 vs Atlassian Rovo

Atlassian Rovo alternative

For companies that are not only an Atlassian shop.

 vs Hebbia

Hebbia alternative

Company-wide cited search, not finance-desk document diligence.

 vs Onyx

Onyx alternative

The same cited, permission-aware answers, fully managed and no-ops.

 vs Bloomfire

Bloomfire alternative

Search where work already lives, instead of curating a knowledge base.

 vs Amazon Q Business

Amazon Q Business alternative

Still open to new customers, and permission-aware by default.

 vs Gemini Enterprise

Gemini Enterprise alternative

Cross-app cited answers without a Google Cloud project to run.

 vs Google Agentspace

Google Agentspace alternative

Agentspace became Gemini Enterprise. Here is what that means for buyers.

 vs ServiceNow Otto

ServiceNow Otto alternative

Otto absorbed Now Assist and Moveworks. Here is the focused option.

 vs Microsoft Copilot Studio

Copilot Studio alternative

Build an agent, or just get the answer.

 vs SharePoint agents

SharePoint agents alternative

Twenty sources is a site bot. Company search is a different job.
See every use case

Find any answer at work with InSearch

One search across all your company apps, a clear cited answer, scoped to exactly what each person can see, and never trained on your data.

See pricing

One search across every app · cited answers · permission-aware · never trains on your data