InSearch
How it works
Enterprise search software AI work assistant Knowledge base search AI enterprise search Internal knowledge search Workplace search Search all company apps AI knowledge assistant Unified search Search Slack & Drive AI assistant for work Knowledge management RAG for enterprise Cited AI answers Confluence search Notion search AI for support agents Sales enablement search Engineering search HR knowledge assistant Permission-aware search Secure AI search Onboarding knowledge SharePoint search See all →
Glean alternative GoSearch alternative Dust alternative Guru alternative Coveo alternative Microsoft Copilot alternative Amazon Kendra alternative Lucidworks alternative Moveworks alternative Sinequa alternative Atlassian Rovo alternative Glean pricing Hebbia alternative Onyx alternative Bloomfire alternative
Security Pricing Blog

Compare · Sinequa

Sinequa alternative: cross-app AI search with cited, permission-aware answers

Sinequa is a serious enterprise search platform with a twenty year track record and a customer list that includes NASA, Airbus, Pfizer, Thales and the European Commission. It was acquired by ChapsVision, a French data intelligence group, in November 2024, and now trades as Sinequa by ChapsVision. If you need air-gapped deployment, sovereign European ownership, or deep indexing of legacy repositories like Documentum, OpenText and SAP, Sinequa is genuinely one of the few credible options on the market and you should take it seriously.

or see the comparison ↓

One search · cited answers · permission-aware

Answer Console
Permission-aware · no PII
Try
Sources

Ask your company anything

InSearch searches across Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce in one query and returns a written answer with citations, only ever from sources you're allowed to see.

Drive Slack Notion Confluence Gmail Jira Salesforce
↓ one clear, cited answer

Searching connected apps

Working

Answer

Only sources you have access to
Sources

Live, interactive · cited answers

Every answer cited to its source documents · permission-aware · never trains on your data

Most teams looking at Sinequa alternatives are not that buyer. They are a company whose knowledge lives in Google Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce, and they want people to stop asking the same question twice. For that job, Sinequa is a large platform with no published pricing, no self-serve option, and a sales-led procurement cycle to get started.

InSearch is the narrower, faster answer. One search across the SaaS apps your team already uses, returning a written answer with inline citations to the exact source, with item-level permissions inherited from each app and enforced at query time. Pricing is transparent and per seat, it never trains on your data, and you connect your apps and start rather than book a demo and wait.

Sinequa, now owned by ChapsVision, is built for the largest regulated enterprises: air-gapped deployment, sovereign ownership and deep legacy repository coverage. InSearch is built for teams whose knowledge lives in the modern SaaS stack and who want cited, permission-aware answers without an enterprise procurement cycle.

Side by side

Sinequa vs InSearch, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters InSearch Sinequa
Ownership Independent product company focused on one thing Acquired by ChapsVision in November 2024; now a business unit of a French data intelligence group
Built for Teams whose knowledge lives in modern SaaS apps Global 2000 enterprises in aerospace, defense, pharma, government and finance
Modern SaaS connectors Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce out of the box Drive, Confluence, Jira, SharePoint, Teams and Salesforce are on the published connector list; Slack and Notion are not
Legacy repositories Not covered; we index the SaaS stack Genuine strength: Documentum, OpenText, SAP, Exchange, databases and mainframe-era stores
Deployment Cloud only Cloud, on-premises, hybrid and air-gapped; a real advantage for classified or sovereign work
Cited answers Written answer with inline citations to the exact source docs Yes, grounded answers with a reference trail
Permission-aware Item-level permissions inherited and enforced at query time Yes, inherits and enforces existing source permissions
Pricing Transparent per seat, published No published pricing; quote-based via sales contact
Getting started Connect your apps and search the same day Book a demo; no self-serve tier is offered
Best suited for Teams that want cited cross-app answers without an enterprise rollout Large regulated enterprises with sovereignty, air-gap or legacy repository requirements

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.

Why teams pick InSearch

One cited, permission-aware search across every app

The modern stack, covered

Sinequa built its connector depth in the era of Documentum and SharePoint. Your knowledge is in Slack threads and Notion pages. InSearch indexes where the work actually happens now.

Start today, not next quarter

No demo gate, no quote cycle, no professional services engagement. Transparent per-seat pricing and a search box your team uses the same day.

Cited and permission-aware

Every answer traces to the exact document behind it, scoped to what each person can already open. Sinequa does this well too; we just do it without the rollout.

Good questions

Sinequa vs InSearch, answered

ChapsVision, a French data intelligence company, acquired Sinequa in November 2024 alongside a US$90 million funding round. Sinequa now trades as Sinequa by ChapsVision and operates as part of a group focused on sovereign and regulated data work, offering on-premises, private cloud and air-gapped deployment.
Sinequa does not publish pricing. Its pricing page lists no tiers or figures and routes every buyer to a demo booking, and third-party directories list it as contact-vendor-for-pricing. Expect a quote-based enterprise procurement cycle rather than a per-seat price you can see upfront. Any specific Sinequa price you find online is not from Sinequa.
It depends on why you were looking at Sinequa. If you need air-gapped deployment, European data sovereignty, or deep indexing of legacy repositories like Documentum or SAP, few tools match it and you should shortlist it seriously. If your knowledge lives in Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce, InSearch covers the modern stack with cited, permission-aware answers and transparent per-seat pricing you can start on today.
Slack does not appear on Sinequa's published connector list, though its marketing material does reference Slack coverage, so it may be available as a custom or unlisted connector. Notion is also absent from the published list. Sinequa's connector depth is strongest in enterprise repositories such as SharePoint, Documentum, OpenText and SAP. If Slack and Notion are where your team actually works, confirm coverage directly before you commit.
Gartner retired the Magic Quadrant for Insight Engines, so no vendor holds that title today. Sinequa's Leader placements are historical, running through roughly 2022. The current Gartner artifact is a Market Guide for Enterprise AI Search, published in September 2025, which names representative vendors rather than ranking them.

More comparisons

See how InSearch compares

vs Glean

Glean alternative

The same cited, permission-aware search, easier to start.

 vs GoSearch

GoSearch alternative

Cited, permission-aware answers across every app.

 vs Dust

Dust alternative

Search-first, with cited answers out of the box.

 vs Guru

Guru alternative

Live search across every app, not just a curated wiki.

 vs Coveo

Coveo alternative

Cited answers and an easy start, not a platform build.

 vs Microsoft Copilot

Microsoft Copilot alternative

Neutral search across every app, not just Microsoft 365.

 vs Amazon Kendra

Amazon Kendra alternative

Kendra is in maintenance mode. Here is where to land.

 vs Lucidworks

Lucidworks alternative

Workplace search without a Kubernetes cluster to run.

 vs Moveworks

Moveworks alternative

Now a ServiceNow product. Here is the independent option.

 vs Atlassian Rovo

Atlassian Rovo alternative

For companies that are not only an Atlassian shop.

 vs Glean

Glean pricing

What Glean actually costs, and what to compare it against.

 vs Hebbia

Hebbia alternative

Company-wide cited search, not finance-desk document diligence.

 vs Onyx

Onyx alternative

The same cited, permission-aware answers, fully managed and no-ops.

 vs Bloomfire

Bloomfire alternative

Search where work already lives, instead of curating a knowledge base.
See every use case

Find any answer at work with InSearch

One search across all your company apps, a clear cited answer, scoped to exactly what each person can see, and never trained on your data.

See pricing

One search across every app · cited answers · permission-aware · never trains on your data