Compare · ServiceNow Otto
ServiceNow Otto alternative: cited, permission-aware enterprise search without the platform
ServiceNow Otto is the newest thing to happen to enterprise AI search, and it is a consolidation story. ServiceNow announced Otto at Knowledge 2026 on May 5, 2026, describing it in its own newsroom as 'a new AI experience that combines the intelligence of Now Assist, Moveworks, and AI Experience to complete work across every department and system.' Three separately sold, separately branded capabilities became one conversational front door. If you bought Moveworks before ServiceNow closed that acquisition on December 15, 2025, or if you have been running Now Assist, Otto is where that investment now lives.
One search · cited answers · permission-aware
Ask your company anything
InSearch searches across Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce in one query and returns a written answer with citations, only ever from sources you're allowed to see.
Searching connected apps
WorkingAnswer
·
Live, interactive · cited answers
Every answer cited to its source documents · permission-aware · never trains on your data
The search piece is real. ServiceNow says Otto can 'search across documents, wikis, databases, and SharePoint, delivering direct answers personalized to role, location, and department.' At announcement it was available in ServiceNow EmployeeWorks and AI Control Tower, with a stated rollout across all products in the year ahead. So it is a genuine enterprise search and answer layer, not just a ticket bot.
The honest question for a buyer is whether the enterprise search you want should arrive attached to a workflow platform. Otto is at its strongest when ServiceNow is already the system of record for IT, HR and employee service, because the value is not the answer alone, it is the answer plus the fulfilment action behind it. If ServiceNow is not your center of gravity, you are buying a large platform to get a search box. InSearch is the focused alternative: one query across Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce, a written answer with inline citations to the exact source, item-level permissions enforced at query time, and one transparent per-seat price with no platform to own.
ServiceNow Otto unified Now Assist, Moveworks and AI Experience into one conversational layer on the ServiceNow AI Platform, announced May 5, 2026. It is strongest where ServiceNow already owns the workflow. InSearch is the focused alternative for teams who want cited, permission-aware cross-app search without adopting a workflow platform.
Side by side
ServiceNow Otto vs InSearch, honestly
A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.
| What matters | InSearch | ServiceNow Otto |
|---|---|---|
| What you are buying | Enterprise search that returns one cited answer | A conversational AI layer on top of the ServiceNow AI Platform, spanning search, assistance and workflow execution |
| Product history | One product, one name, no consolidation in flight | Merged Now Assist, Moveworks and AI Experience in May 2026, rolling out product by product |
| Prerequisite | None. Connect your apps and ask | Assumes ServiceNow is deployed and is your system of record |
| Search coverage | Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce in one query | ServiceNow says documents, wikis, databases and SharePoint, personalized to role, location and department |
| Permission handling | Item-level permissions inherited from each source and enforced live at query time | Governed access, personalized by role, location and department |
| Action and fulfilment | Answers questions. It does not run your service catalog | Genuinely strong. Routes requests, crosses systems and completes the work. This is the real advantage |
| Pricing | Transparent per-seat pricing, published | No public list price. ServiceNow platform agreements are negotiated, and reported Moveworks deals ran into six figures a year |
| Best suited for | Teams that want cited answers across the apps they already use | ServiceNow-centric enterprises consolidating employee service and IT onto one platform |
Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.
Why teams pick InSearch
One cited, permission-aware search across every app
Consolidation is the story
Otto folded Now Assist, Moveworks and AI Experience into one brand. Anything you read about buying those separately is now out of date, so evaluate the merged product, not the old datasheets.
Platform gravity is the real cost
Otto pays off when ServiceNow already owns your workflows, because the answer comes with the action. Without that gravity you are funding a platform to get a search experience.
Cited answers, scoped per person
InSearch returns a written answer with inline citations to the exact source document, limited to what each person can already open, and never trains on your data.
Good questions
ServiceNow Otto vs InSearch, answered
More comparisons
See how InSearch compares
Glean alternative
The same cited, permission-aware search, easier to start.
vs GoSearchGoSearch alternative
Cited, permission-aware answers across every app.
vs DustDust alternative
Search-first, with cited answers out of the box.
vs GuruGuru alternative
Live search across every app, not just a curated wiki.
vs CoveoCoveo alternative
Cited answers and an easy start, not a platform build.
vs Microsoft CopilotMicrosoft Copilot alternative
Neutral search across every app, not just Microsoft 365.
vs Amazon KendraAmazon Kendra alternative
Kendra is in maintenance mode. Here is where to land.
vs LucidworksLucidworks alternative
Workplace search without a Kubernetes cluster to run.
vs MoveworksMoveworks alternative
Now a ServiceNow product. Here is the independent option.
vs SinequaSinequa alternative
Built for the modern SaaS stack, not a two-year rollout.
vs Atlassian RovoAtlassian Rovo alternative
For companies that are not only an Atlassian shop.
vs GleanGlean pricing
What Glean actually costs, and what to compare it against.
vs HebbiaHebbia alternative
Company-wide cited search, not finance-desk document diligence.
vs OnyxOnyx alternative
The same cited, permission-aware answers, fully managed and no-ops.
vs BloomfireBloomfire alternative
Search where work already lives, instead of curating a knowledge base.
vs Amazon Q BusinessAmazon Q Business alternative
Still open to new customers, and permission-aware by default.
vs Amazon Quick SuiteAmazon Quick Suite alternative
Cited, permission-aware search without the migration project.
vs Amazon Q BusinessAmazon Q Business pricing
Seats are the small half of the bill. Index capacity is the rest.
vs Gemini EnterpriseGemini Enterprise alternative
Cross-app cited answers without a Google Cloud project to run.
vs Gemini EnterpriseGemini Enterprise pricing
Four editions, an annual discount, and an overage SKU nobody budgets for.
vs Google AgentspaceGoogle Agentspace alternative
Agentspace became Gemini Enterprise. Here is what that means for buyers.
vs Microsoft Copilot StudioCopilot Studio alternative
Build an agent, or just get the answer.
vs Microsoft CopilotMicrosoft Copilot pricing
What Copilot actually costs, and what the license does not cover.
Find any answer at work with InSearch
One search across all your company apps, a clear cited answer, scoped to exactly what each person can see, and never trained on your data.
One search across every app · cited answers · permission-aware · never trains on your data