InSearch
How it works
Enterprise search software AI work assistant Knowledge base search AI enterprise search Internal knowledge search Workplace search Search all company apps AI knowledge assistant Unified search Search Slack & Drive AI assistant for work Knowledge management RAG for enterprise Cited AI answers Confluence search Notion search AI for support agents Sales enablement search Engineering search HR knowledge assistant Permission-aware search Secure AI search Onboarding knowledge SharePoint search See all →
Glean alternative GoSearch alternative Dust alternative Guru alternative Coveo alternative Microsoft Copilot alternative Amazon Kendra alternative Lucidworks alternative Moveworks alternative Sinequa alternative Atlassian Rovo alternative Glean pricing Hebbia alternative Onyx alternative Bloomfire alternative
Security Pricing Blog

Compare · GoSearch

GoSearch alternative: cited, permission-aware answers across every app

GoSearch is a capable enterprise search tool that unifies your apps and is often positioned as a more affordable option in the category. Teams comparing GoSearch alternatives are typically weighing breadth of connectors, the quality of the cited answer, and how seriously permissions and data privacy are handled.

or see the comparison ↓

One search · cited answers · permission-aware

Answer Console
Permission-aware · no PII
Try
Sources

Ask your company anything

InSearch searches across Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce in one query and returns a written answer with citations, only ever from sources you're allowed to see.

Drive Slack Notion Confluence Gmail Jira Salesforce
↓ one clear, cited answer

Searching connected apps

Working

Answer

Only sources you have access to
Sources

Live, interactive · cited answers

Every answer cited to its source documents · permission-aware · never trains on your data

InSearch leads on exactly those points. It searches Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce in one query and returns a written answer with inline citations to the exact sources, with item-level permissions enforced at query time so each person only sees what they can already open. It never trains on your data and is encrypted under SOC 2 practices, all on transparent per-seat pricing.

GoSearch is a solid, value-positioned enterprise search tool. InSearch competes on the depth of the cited answer and a permission-aware, never-trained-on foundation, with transparent per-seat pricing.

Side by side

GoSearch vs InSearch, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters InSearch GoSearch
Cross-app unified search One query across Drive, Slack, Notion, Confluence, Gmail, Jira and Salesforce Unified search across connected workplace apps
Cited answers Written answer with inline citations to the exact source docs AI answers across connected sources
Permission-aware Item-level permissions enforced at query time, per person Source permission handling
Training on your data Never trains on customer data, encrypted under SOC 2 practices Standard security controls
Pricing Transparent per-seat plans you can see upfront Positioned as a lower-cost option in the category
Best suited for Teams that want a deep cited answer with strong permission handling Teams seeking affordable unified search

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.

Why teams pick InSearch

One cited, permission-aware search across every app

Depth of the answer

A written, cited answer you can verify, not just a faster set of links across your apps.

Permission-aware by design

Item-level access controls enforced at query time, so a company-wide rollout stays safe.

Never trained on

Your data answers your questions and is never used to train models.

Good questions

GoSearch vs InSearch, answered

If your priority is the quality of the cited answer plus serious permission handling and a never-trained-on guarantee, yes. InSearch unifies the same apps and competes on the depth and trustworthiness of the answer, on transparent per-seat pricing.
InSearch inherits each source's native, item-level access controls and enforces them at query time, so every person only ever gets answers from content they can already open.

More comparisons

See how InSearch compares

vs Glean

Glean alternative

The same cited, permission-aware search, easier to start.

 vs Dust

Dust alternative

Search-first, with cited answers out of the box.

 vs Guru

Guru alternative

Live search across every app, not just a curated wiki.

 vs Coveo

Coveo alternative

Cited answers and an easy start, not a platform build.

 vs Microsoft Copilot

Microsoft Copilot alternative

Neutral search across every app, not just Microsoft 365.

 vs Amazon Kendra

Amazon Kendra alternative

Kendra is in maintenance mode. Here is where to land.

 vs Lucidworks

Lucidworks alternative

Workplace search without a Kubernetes cluster to run.

 vs Moveworks

Moveworks alternative

Now a ServiceNow product. Here is the independent option.

 vs Sinequa

Sinequa alternative

Built for the modern SaaS stack, not a two-year rollout.

 vs Atlassian Rovo

Atlassian Rovo alternative

For companies that are not only an Atlassian shop.

 vs Glean

Glean pricing

What Glean actually costs, and what to compare it against.

 vs Hebbia

Hebbia alternative

Company-wide cited search, not finance-desk document diligence.

 vs Onyx

Onyx alternative

The same cited, permission-aware answers, fully managed and no-ops.

 vs Bloomfire

Bloomfire alternative

Search where work already lives, instead of curating a knowledge base.
See every use case

Find any answer at work with InSearch

One search across all your company apps, a clear cited answer, scoped to exactly what each person can see, and never trained on your data.

See pricing

One search across every app · cited answers · permission-aware · never trains on your data